Artificial Intelligence
Design and deliver AI systems — document intelligence, LLM applications and decision support — that are secure and governed.
AI Security
Assess and secure machine-learning models, LLM applications and AI agents against adversarial and data-driven attacks.
The problem
AI systems introduce attack paths that traditional application testing does not cover: prompt injection, training-data poisoning, model extraction, sensitive-data leakage through outputs and agents that take actions with excessive permissions.
Our approach
Identify models, providers, data flows and the decisions or actions each system can influence.
Apply the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications and MITRE ATLAS to the specific architecture.
Red-team prompts, retrieval pipelines, tool calls and output handling against realistic abuse.
Implement guardrails, evaluation suites and monitoring aligned to the NIST AI RMF.
Capabilities
Direct and indirect prompt injection, jailbreak resistance, data exfiltration and insecure output handling.
Tool permission scoping, human-in-the-loop controls and action authorisation.
Data provenance, training pipeline integrity, model registry and artefact signing.
Adversarial input testing and evasion analysis for classification and scoring models.
Policies, model inventories and risk assessments mapped to NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001.
Input and output filtering, retrieval access control and evaluation harnesses.
Engagement
Standards & technology
FAQ
We test your application and how it uses the model — prompts, retrieval, tools, output handling and access control. Testing the provider’s underlying model itself is governed by that provider’s terms.
Yes. Internal assistants often have access to sensitive documents and systems, and indirect prompt injection through shared content is a realistic internal threat.
Let’s discuss it. Tell us what you are working on and an engineer — not a sales script — will respond.