AI Security

Security for AI systems — from training data to production agents

Assess and secure machine-learning models, LLM applications and AI agents against adversarial and data-driven attacks.

The problem

Why this matters

AI systems introduce attack paths that traditional application testing does not cover: prompt injection, training-data poisoning, model extraction, sensitive-data leakage through outputs and agents that take actions with excessive permissions.

Common challenges

  • LLM applications that trust untrusted content in prompts and retrieved documents
  • Agents and tools granted broader permissions than their task requires
  • Limited visibility into training-data provenance
  • Emerging regulatory expectations for AI risk management

Our approach

How we work

  1. Inventory AI usage

    Identify models, providers, data flows and the decisions or actions each system can influence.

  2. Threat-model the system

    Apply the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications and MITRE ATLAS to the specific architecture.

  3. Test adversarially

    Red-team prompts, retrieval pipelines, tool calls and output handling against realistic abuse.

  4. Govern and monitor

    Implement guardrails, evaluation suites and monitoring aligned to the NIST AI RMF.

Capabilities

What our ai security work covers

  • 01

    LLM application testing

    Direct and indirect prompt injection, jailbreak resistance, data exfiltration and insecure output handling.

  • 02

    AI agent security review

    Tool permission scoping, human-in-the-loop controls and action authorisation.

  • 03

    ML pipeline security

    Data provenance, training pipeline integrity, model registry and artefact signing.

  • 04

    Model robustness evaluation

    Adversarial input testing and evasion analysis for classification and scoring models.

  • 05

    AI governance frameworks

    Policies, model inventories and risk assessments mapped to NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001.

  • 06

    Guardrail engineering

    Input and output filtering, retrieval access control and evaluation harnesses.

Engagement

Deliverables and benefits

What you receive

  • AI system threat model
  • Adversarial test report with reproducible cases
  • Guardrail and architecture recommendations
  • AI risk register and governance artefacts

What it changes

  • AI features released with known, managed risk
  • Defensible position for regulators and customers
  • Reusable evaluation suites for future model changes

Standards & technology

  • OWASP LLM Top 10
  • MITRE ATLAS
  • NIST AI RMF
  • ISO/IEC 42001
  • MLflow
  • Python

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Do you test third-party models such as hosted LLM APIs?

We test your application and how it uses the model — prompts, retrieval, tools, output handling and access control. Testing the provider’s underlying model itself is governed by that provider’s terms.

Is AI security relevant if we only use AI internally?

Yes. Internal assistants often have access to sensitive documents and systems, and indirect prompt injection through shared content is a realistic internal threat.

Discuss your ai security requirements

Let’s discuss it. Tell us what you are working on and an engineer — not a sales script — will respond.